(I've taken the month off of blogging in a vain attempt to write a 50,000-word novel for NANOWRIMO. I break my silence for this brief comment).
With no disrespect intended to anybody who feels differently, and my apologies to those who I consider my friends and allies,
If you intend to enforce party discipline and the rules, you should start with someone for whom you have proof of rule-breaking.
Absent any indication otherwise, I intend to vote yes.
If you know what I'm talking about, you know what I mean. If you don't, this message is not for you.
My daughter is 20,000+ words ahead of me. Back to work.
At least one individual cited chapter and verse. That should be sufficient. It's one thing to avail one's self of internal party processes for appeal; it's another entirely to publicly attack the process. The former constitutes an effort to right a perceived wrong; the latter is nothing more than an attempt to harm the process and the victor it produces.
ReplyDeleteThis is Virginia. Honor still means something.